Tag Archives: police misconduct

Civil Rights Lawsuit

Los Angeles Police Face Civil Rights Lawsuit Over Teen’s Alleged Racial Profiling

An 18-year-old Black man has filed a civil rights lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles, claiming he was racially profiled and violently detained by police officers while still a minor. The complaint, lodged in Los Angeles Superior Court on Monday, names the city as defendant and seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.

Lawsuit Alleges Pattern of Profiling

The plaintiff, Jeramiah Burge, states in his filing that officers targeted him because of his age and race. “Burge was racially profiled as a criminal and a gang member based on being a teenager, young and Black,” the suit alleges.

Burge contends that what began as an ordinary evening visit to family in South Los Angeles turned into a traumatic confrontation with law enforcement.

Story Highlights

  • Plaintiff: 18-year-old Jeramiah Burge

  • Filed: Civil rights lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court

  • Defendant: City of Los Angeles

  • Key Allegations: Racial profiling, assault, battery, negligence, excessive force

  • Incident: June 30, 2024, South Los Angeles

  • Main Claims: Officers questioned Burge about gang ties and weapons, then used force

  • Relief Sought: Unspecified compensatory and punitive damages

Evening in South Los Angeles Turns Into Detention

According to the lawsuit, Burge and his mother were visiting friends on the evening of June 30, 2024. When his mother went into a store, he waited in the passenger seat of a friend’s car and spoke on the phone.

At that point, the complaint states, two Los Angeles police officers — one male and one female — approached the car. One allegedly asked him, “Are you a gang banger?” Another followed up by asking whether he had a gun in the vehicle.

Burge says he replied “no” to both questions. The filing claims that despite his answers, the officers ordered him to exit the car, pushed him against the hood, and repeatedly told him to stop resisting. The lawsuit asserts that he was not resisting at any time.

Use of Force Detailed in Complaint

The court filing goes on to describe a series of actions Burge says were unprovoked. According to the lawsuit, the officers kicked his feet out from under him, causing him to fall. He had a recently fractured shoulder at the time and says the officers denied his request to call his mother.

The complaint further alleges that additional officers arrived at the scene, threw him to the ground again, threatened to shoot him with a stun gun, slapped him multiple times in the face, used the stun gun on his chest several times, and placed him in a chokehold, making it hard for him to breathe.

He was hospitalized with injuries, the suit states, and when his mother returned about 30 minutes later, officers allegedly refused to tell her what had happened.

Possible Video Evidence and Continuing Impact

Burge’s lawsuit says he believes body-worn camera footage and nearby surveillance cameras recorded the incident. He maintains he had done nothing wrong to justify being detained, arrested or subjected to excessive force.

The complaint also details ongoing harm, including loss of past and future income, fear, anxiety, headaches, sleep disturbance and difficulty concentrating.

City Response Pending

A representative for the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the civil rights lawsuit.

The case highlights ongoing public debates in Los Angeles about racial profiling, use of force, and police accountability — topics that have drawn national attention and legal action in recent years.

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles.

Boston Police Watchdog vs Commissioner: Why Accountability Fails

The sun had set on a February night in 2022 when three teenage boys wrapped up a basketball game at the Harbor Point Apartments in Dorchester Bay. As they walked home, an unmarked black Ford Explorer began following them. Nervous, they slipped into a nearby basement — only to be cornered by three more black cars when they emerged.

According to a report by Boston’s Office of Police Accountability and Transparency (OPAT), officers jumped out with guns drawn, shouting, “Do not move or we will shoot you.” One teen said an officer tackled him, leaving a deep cut over his eyebrow. Later, on body camera audio, Officer Matthew Conley admitted: “I literally had the gun in my hand, so I punched him in the face with it.”

The oversight agency recommended Conley’s termination. Instead, Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox declined to fire him. Two years later, in December 2023, Conley was promoted to detective.

City records and public documents obtained by WBUR show that Cox has repeatedly rejected OPAT’s recommendations, sparking concerns about the office’s ability to enforce accountability within the Boston Police Department.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Incident: Teenagers wrongfully detained in Harbor Point, one injured by officer.

  • Officer Involved: Matthew Conley admitted hitting teen with gun; promoted later.

  • OPAT Role: Recommended termination; Commissioner Cox rejected.

  • Commissioner’s Stance: Prefers internal investigations over civilian oversight findings.

  • Discipline Record: 18 sustained complaints since 2020, only one acted upon fully.

  • Bigger Picture: Police reform efforts post-George Floyd now appear to be losing momentum.

An Office to Dismantle Systemic Racism

Formed in 2020 amid nationwide calls for reform following George Floyd’s murder, OPAT was designed to review complaints against Boston police and recommend discipline through a nine-member civilian review board. The board includes civil rights advocates, neighborhood representatives, and a youth delegate.

Then-Mayor Marty Walsh said the goal was to “dismantle systemic racism across our city.” However, critics warned from the start that the ordinance lacked enforcement power.

Those concerns now appear justified. For example, OPAT recommended retraining for the department’s media team after they posted a juvenile homicide victim’s name online. Cox refused, arguing privacy rights end after death.

In another case, OPAT recommended a five-day suspension for Officer Louisimond Vertyl, accused of injuring a disabled man during a traffic stop. Cox rejected that as well, citing insufficient evidence.

Pattern of Resistance

Since 2020, OPAT sustained 18 complaints against officers and recommended disciplinary actions. Cox fully accepted just one — a verbal reprimand for profanity directed at a delivery driver. In eight cases, the commissioner never responded.

Cox told WBUR that Boston police conduct their own thorough and fair investigations. “We have a duty to investigate all allegations of misconduct,” he said, adding that the oversight office can offer feedback but does not dictate discipline.

Cox declined to comment on the Conley case specifically.

The Harbor Point Sting Gone Wrong

Conley led a Youth Violence Strike Force operation in Dorchester that night in 2022. Officers were searching for a gang associate in a powder-blue Nike sweatshirt. Conley tackled one of the boys — who was wearing navy blue Polo gear — and struck him in the face. Later, Conley admitted in body cam audio that he hit the teen with his gun.

OPAT called the incident a “significant mistake” that could have “resulted in death.” It recommended termination. Cox refused, waiting for an internal review. That review concluded there was no way to confirm or disprove the allegation.

Conley received only a written reprimand for failing to wear his body camera. In 2024, he earned $330,000, including overtime.

Police Reform Momentum Fading

Community activists say Boston’s struggle reflects a national trend of retreating police reforms. Federal oversight agreements have been rolled back, and states like California are revisiting earlier reform laws.

Mayor Michelle Wu, once an advocate for cutting the police budget, has softened her stance. She now supports intelligence operations and has gained the backing of the city’s largest police union ahead of her re-election bid.

Meanwhile, OPAT logged a record 139 complaints in 2024, signaling growing community distrust.

“Five years ago, police reform was all the rage,” said Roxbury activist Jamarhl Crawford. “Now, it seems like the fix is in.”

The Harbor Point incident and the promotion of an officer involved in a violent wrongful detention highlight deep flaws in Boston’s police accountability system. While OPAT was created to ensure transparency and restore public trust, its lack of enforcement power has left disciplinary decisions in the hands of the very department it is meant to oversee. With only one recommendation fully implemented out of 18 sustained complaints, critics argue that Boston’s police reform promises are failing. As national momentum for reform wanes and internal investigations continue to override civilian oversight, questions remain: Can Boston deliver true accountability, or will this remain another unfulfilled reform effort?

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles.

Dallas Cop Caught in Apple Store Heist, Says Shocking Affidavit

A Dallas police officer has been accused of stealing Apple merchandise worth $37,000 while working off-duty as an overnight security guard at local Apple Stores. The arrest came after Apple’s security team, puzzled by unusual stock losses at its Dallas outlets—NorthPark, Knox Street, and the Galleria—launched a discreet investigation. Hidden cameras and surveillance footage allegedly caught the officer smuggling products in his uniform. The case now unveils a dramatic twist where duty and theft dangerously collided under the watchful glow of retail lights and silent store cameras.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Apple’s Dallas stores reported unusually high stock discrepancies.

  • Senior Cpl. Le Chau was allegedly caught on camera stealing merchandise.

  • Chau reportedly concealed AirPods in his police jacket, hid a trash picker down his pants.

  • Apple security installed covert cameras after initial suspicions.

  • Chau’s wife allegedly sold Apple products on Facebook Marketplace.

  • Chau has been placed on leave during an internal police investigation.

  • Officer joined the Dallas Police Department in 2013, assigned to the Basic Academy.

A Dallas police officer, once trusted to safeguard local Apple retail outlets during his off-duty hours, is now at the center of a startling criminal investigation. According to an arrest warrant affidavit obtained by WFAA, Senior Corporal Le Chau has been accused of stealing thousands of dollars in merchandise from three Apple Stores across the Dallas area — all while wearing his police uniform.

Apple’s internal security team first raised red flags after noticing troubling patterns across its Dallas locations — particularly stores at NorthPark, Knox Street, and the Galleria. Over the course of two years, these stores reported what Apple described as “exceptionally high” stock discrepancies. These irregularities placed them among the top ten nationwide for inventory loss, sparking a deeper look into the possible cause.

Apple’s security division, in response to the repeated loss reports, launched an internal investigation. After combing through hours of surveillance footage, their attention quickly narrowed to one recurring figure: an off-duty police officer consistently seen arriving with duffel bags and leaving with them “fully loaded.”

The affidavit outlines an especially revealing incident from March. Surveillance footage allegedly shows Chau climbing onto the top shelf of a stockroom, using a trash picker to grab hard-to-reach Apple products — including a sealed box of AirPods Pro. The report states he attempted to discreetly hide the box in his police jacket and slipped the trash picker down his pants.

“Serial numbers from that specific AirPods box were later discovered in a trash can inside the store’s restroom,” police investigators confirmed in the affidavit.

In another recorded moment from the same month, Chau was reportedly seen stuffing items into his Dallas Police Department-issued jacket before making a quiet exit from the store. These scenes prompted Apple to take their internal investigation a step further. Covert surveillance equipment was discreetly installed, which the affidavit claims captured Chau actively removing merchandise from the store during his overnight shifts.

Adding another layer to the case, Apple investigators also presented law enforcement with screenshots from Chau’s wife’s Facebook profile. The images, as described in the affidavit, show listings of Apple merchandise on Facebook Marketplace, suggesting the stolen items may have been sold online.

The Dallas Police Department has since acknowledged the situation. “Senior Corporal Le Chau has been placed on administrative leave while an internal investigation proceeds,” a department spokesperson stated. Chau, who has served with the department since 2013, was most recently assigned to the department’s Basic Academy.

While no formal statement has been released by Chau or his legal representatives, the allegations have cast a sharp spotlight on the role of off-duty officers working private security and the level of trust extended to law enforcement personnel within corporate spaces.

Apple, known for its strict internal controls, has not issued a public comment on the incident but has fully cooperated with law enforcement throughout the investigation. The company’s detailed tracking systems and surveillance footage proved critical in identifying the pattern of losses — a process that ultimately led to the officer’s arrest.

As the investigation continues, the case raises broader concerns about internal theft, oversight in private security hiring, and how even the most secure retail environments can become vulnerable from within.

The unfolding investigation into the alleged thefts at Apple Stores in Dallas reveals a disturbing breach of trust, where a sworn officer is now at the center of a high-value retail scandal. As evidence mounts—surveillance footage, covert recordings, and digital traces—the case highlights the vulnerabilities even within heavily secured environments. While the Dallas Police Department conducts its internal inquiry, the incident serves as a sharp reminder that misconduct can stem from unexpected quarters, and accountability remains crucial—regardless of the badge or uniform worn.

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles.

Trouble Behind the Badge: Chicago Cop’s Short Career Marked by Scandal and Tragedy

A young Chicago police officer’s long trail of misconduct complaints has now collided with a deadly mistake—an accidental shooting that left his own partner, Officer Krystal Rivera, fatally wounded. Once hailed for his bold social media presence and rapid rise, Officer Carlos A. Baker’s record reveals a series of missteps, suspensions, and internal probes. The tragic “friendly fire” incident, now under intense review, has reopened serious questions about how the Chicago Police Department manages discipline, assignments, and tactical units within its most sensitive ranks. A storm brews beneath the badge.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Officer Carlos A. Baker joined the force in December 2021; he had more than a dozen misconduct complaints

  • His disciplinary record includes three suspensions, two reprimands, and five current investigations

  • He was involved in the accidental shooting death of his partner, Officer Krystal Rivera, during a tactical operation

  • Rivera was the first CPD officer in nearly 40 years to die from friendly fire

  • Baker had prior allegations including flashing a gun at a woman and wrongfully detaining a man

  • The incident raises concerns about CPD tactical teams and oversight practices

  • The same tactical team was previously involved in a mishandled gun buyback operation that led to a stolen Glock later used in shootings

A young Chicago police officer is now at the center of a tragedy that has reignited concerns about police oversight, internal accountability, and department decision-making. Officer Carlos A. Baker, whose disciplinary record already raised eyebrows, accidentally shot and killed his partner, Officer Krystal Rivera, during a chaotic encounter with armed suspects earlier this month. The fatal incident has drawn renewed focus not only on Baker’s history but also on the Chicago Police Department’s tactical operations and internal culture.

A Tragic Turn Amidst a Pattern of Complaints

Officer Baker’s career with the Chicago Police Department began in December 2021, but it was quickly marred by multiple disciplinary incidents. From the beginning, his record diverged significantly from the norm. Within just a few months of joining the force, Baker had already amassed a string of misconduct complaints—more than a dozen in total—placing him among a very small percentage of officers with such high complaint volumes. Data compiled by the Invisible Institute shows that only about 5% of Chicago police officers collected six or more misconduct complaints between 2018 and 2023.

What’s more concerning is that many of Baker’s issues emerged during his probationary period—a time when officers can be dismissed relatively easily due to their limited union protections. Yet, despite facing at least five complaints during that phase alone, Baker not only remained on the force but was later assigned to the Gresham District’s tactical team, a specialized unit tasked with aggressively targeting drugs, guns, and high-crime activity.

The Night That Changed Everything

On the night of June 5, Baker and Officer Rivera—partners on the tactical team—were patrolling the South Side when they spotted a man carrying a firearm in the 8200 block of South Drexel Avenue. The officers pursued the individual into a nearby apartment complex. There, chaos unfolded.

According to prosecutors, a second man inside the apartment aimed an AR-style pistol at Officer Baker. In the seconds that followed, Baker’s weapon discharged, striking Officer Rivera in the back. Authorities have described the shooting as inadvertent—an accident in a high-pressure moment. Rivera succumbed to her injuries, marking the first time in nearly four decades that a Chicago police officer was killed by friendly fire.

Two suspects were later charged in connection to the confrontation, while Baker was placed on standard administrative duty as per department policy, which requires at least 30 days of non-field work following a police-involved shooting.

Past Misconduct and Missed Red Flags

Though the June shooting may have been unintended, the circumstances surrounding Baker’s continued deployment in a tactical unit have prompted serious questions. Department records, though restricted due to an ongoing Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA) investigation and a court order, indicate that Baker had already faced three suspensions and two formal reprimands prior to the shooting.

One early incident occurred on his very first shift on street patrol when he reportedly failed to arrest a home invasion suspect. Another serious accusation came from a woman who told COPA that Baker—while off duty—showed up at a bar uninvited and flashed a gun at her after discovering she was with another man. Though she initially contacted 911, she later ceased cooperation and withheld alleged video evidence, resulting in no formal discipline for Baker.

Other documented issues include a wrongful vehicle stop that led to a five-day suspension. In that case, Baker and another officer handcuffed and searched a man based on incorrect information that the vehicle was stolen. After releasing the man without charges, the officers failed to file the required paperwork. COPA acknowledged they acted in “good faith” but ruled that their follow-up conduct was improper.

An Officer’s Social Media Persona

Baker’s presence extended beyond the streets. While still on probation, he garnered viral attention on TikTok, dancing in uniform at the Sueños Music Festival and participating in online trends using police radios. Some videos even showed him sitting inside a police vehicle. Though these videos brought him popularity online, they also raised questions about professionalism, focus, and conduct during duty hours.

Before his police career, Baker played football at Southern Utah University. Yet his time on the force has largely been overshadowed by controversies rather than commendations. His social media fame, coupled with a series of questionable judgment calls, paints a complex picture of a young officer both celebrated and scrutinized.

Previous Failures Within the Same Tactical Unit

The deadly shooting is the second troubling episode involving the Gresham District tactical team in recent months. In December 2023, the unit oversaw a gun buyback program at St. Sabina Church that took an unexpected turn. A .45-caliber Glock 21 turned in at the event later went missing from a room inside the tactical team’s office—while officers were still inventorying weapons.

The weapon didn’t just disappear. A year later, police recovered it from a 16-year-old boy after it had been linked to multiple shootings. Officer Rivera had been a key witness in that internal investigation. Records confirm she had no role in the weapon’s disappearance and actively searched colleagues’ belongings in an effort to locate it. Following questions from the Chicago Sun-Times and the Illinois Answers Project, CPD reopened the probe into the Glock’s theft.

Grief, Accountability, and the Road Ahead

At the moment, Baker is facing five new internal disciplinary investigations, including allegations of insubordination and failure to conduct proper searches. His attorney, Tim Grace, has emphasized the dangers of police work and referred to the shooting as “a tragic accident.” He insisted that focus should remain on the loss of Officer Rivera, calling her “a great police officer and equally great person.”

Still, the questions persist. How does an officer with so many early complaints ascend to a high-pressure tactical team? What oversight mechanisms failed? Could Officer Rivera’s death have been prevented if earlier red flags were heeded?

While investigations remain ongoing, this incident underscores the urgent need for reviewing internal staffing, supervision, and disciplinary follow-through—particularly when lives are on the line.

As Chicago mourns one of its own, the city also faces uncomfortable truths about how its officers are trained, monitored, and held accountable. The tragedy of June 5 will not be forgotten—but what comes next may define the path forward for one of America’s most scrutinized police departments.

The accidental killing of Officer Krystal Rivera by her partner, Officer Carlos A. Baker, has pulled back the curtain on deep-rooted flaws within the Chicago Police Department’s oversight and deployment system. With a trail of prior complaints and disciplinary actions, Baker’s case now stands as a stark example of what happens when warning signs go unaddressed. As investigations continue, the tragedy serves not only as a personal loss but also as a piercing reminder of the urgent need for stronger accountability, stricter supervision, and greater transparency in policing practices.

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles