Tag Archives: Illinois politics

Pentagon

Pentagon Plans National Guard Deployment in Chicago: Security Move or Political Theater?

Leave a reply

The Pentagon is quietly drafting plans for a potential National Guard deployment in Chicago, a senior U.S. official confirmed on Sunday. The revelation has sparked immediate political backlash from Illinois leaders and city officials, who say the move is unnecessary, unconstitutional, and a dangerous overreach by the federal government.

According to The Washington Post, discussions about sending federal troops to Chicago have been underway for weeks. Options reportedly include deploying several thousand Guard members as early as September. The reported goal: to curb crime, address homelessness, and crack down on illegal immigration.

A Pentagon spokesperson would not confirm specific operational details but emphasized the Department’s planning responsibilities.

“We won’t speculate on further operations. The Department is a planning organization and is continuously working with other agency partners on plans to protect federal assets and personnel,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

Story Highlights

  • Pentagon drafting plans for National Guard use in Chicago.

  • Deployment could involve thousands of troops as early as September.

  • Mayor Brandon Johnson calls the move “costly, illegal, and unconstitutional.”

  • Trump says Chicago will “likely be next” after Washington, D.C. deployment.

  • Crime in Chicago has dropped significantly, city data shows.

  • Illinois leaders vow legal action to block federal troop deployment.

Mayor Johnson Pushes Back: “Chicago Will Not Waver”

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said he has had no communication with the White House regarding the proposal and condemned the potential deployment in strong terms.

“What this president is attempting to do is not just unconstitutional, but it is very much a threat to our democracy,” Johnson said.

Johnson stressed that Chicago has successfully reduced violence without federal intervention.

“Chicago is not calling for a military occupation of our city. We are focused on constitutional policing, violence prevention, and investing in communities,” he stated.

Johnson pointed to recent crime statistics as proof that local strategies are working.

“This past year alone, we have seen more than a 30% reduction in homicides, a 35% reduction in robberies, and an almost 40% reduction in shootings. We need to keep building on this work,” he said.

Crime Trends vs. Federal Claims

The president has repeatedly described Chicago as a dangerous city, but data tells a different story. According to Chicago Police Department figures analyzed by ABC7, overall crime is down 13% compared to last year. Violent crime has dropped by 23%, and property crimes are down 11%.

Senator Dick Durbin criticized the president’s plan as “political theater”, arguing that these moves distract from pressing national issues.

“What President Trump is doing in D.C. is purely political theater. His actions are creating chaos and sowing fear rather than making our nation’s capital safer, and now he says Chicago will be his next target,” Durbin said.

Illinois Leaders Unite Against Federal Troops

Governor JB Pritzker, Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton, and Attorney General Kwame Raoul have also expressed strong opposition.

“There is no emergency that warrants the President of the United States federalizing the Illinois National Guard or sending active-duty military within our borders,” Pritzker said.

Lt. Governor Stratton called the move a “manufactured crisis” designed to gain political power.

“Crime in Chicago is declining and there’s absolutely no rationale for this decision, other than to distract from the pain Trump is inflicting on working families with his dangerous agenda,” Stratton stated.

Trump: “Chicago Will Likely Be Next”

Despite mounting opposition, Trump indicated last Friday that Chicago is the next target for his crackdown efforts following the deployment of 2,000 troops in Washington, D.C.

“I think Chicago will be our next,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

He added:

“Chicago is a mess. People are screaming for us to come. We’ll straighten that one out probably next. That will be our next one after this.”

Trump suggested that New York City could follow.

Public Reaction Divided

While state and city leaders strongly oppose the move, some Chicago residents support the idea, citing persistent concerns about crime.

“It’s too much crime, so it needs to be some type of law and order, and if this administration cannot get it done, the Johnson administration can’t get it done… then yeah, we need the National Guard,” said Zoe Leigh, a local resident.

Mayor Johnson has vowed legal action if the Guard is deployed, though it remains unclear how effective that would be. Similar lawsuits in other states remain unresolved.

What’s Next?

For now, Chicago officials remain on high alert as discussions continue in Washington. Whether the Pentagon moves forward with a deployment will likely depend on political, legal, and security calculations in the coming weeks.

The debate over National Guard deployment in Chicago underscores a growing clash between federal authority and local governance. While the Pentagon continues to emphasize that its planning is precautionary, the political and legal pushback from Illinois leaders signals a fierce battle ahead. With crime in Chicago trending downward and city officials prioritizing community-based solutions, many argue that the proposed deployment is unnecessary and politically motivated.

As both sides dig in, the coming weeks will reveal whether this plan remains on paper or escalates into a constitutional showdown over the role of federal troops in American cities. For now, Chicago stands firm: “We will not bend, we will never break.”

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles.

Texas Democrats Bolt to Illinois to Freeze GOP’s Redistricting Plot

Leave a reply

In a dramatic and politically charged move, dozens of  Texas House Democrats arrived in Illinois on Sunday evening, walking directly into the national spotlight as they took a firm and highly public stand against a redistricting push led by their Republican counterparts back home. Their decision to leave the state effectively denied the Texas House the quorum needed to pass a new congressional map — one critics say is designed to cement GOP control and protect former President Donald Trump’s influence heading into the 2026 midterm elections.

The Democratic legislators, some visibly fatigued but resolute, arrived at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport and were immediately welcomed by Illinois Governor JB Pritzker. What followed was not merely a show of state-to-state solidarity, but a charged press conference in which accusations of political manipulation, racial gerrymandering, and even authoritarianism dominated the air.

At a late-night event held at the DuPage County Democratic Party headquarters in Carol Stream, Gov. Pritzker offered a full-throated defense of the visiting Texas Democrats. He criticized the motives behind the redistricting session, suggesting that the GOP’s intent went far beyond standard legislative duties.

“Let’s be clear,” Pritzker said firmly, “this is not just rigging the system in Texas. It’s about rigging the system against the rights of all Americans for years to come.”

Referring directly to Donald Trump, Pritzker did not hold back.

“Donald Trump is a cheater — we know that. And so is the attorney general of Texas, Ken Paxton. This isn’t about legislative fairness; this is about one man’s fear of losing power. A cult leader who’s now dictating political maps.”

The Illinois governor, who has clashed repeatedly with Texas Governor Greg Abbott in recent years over immigration and sanctuary policies, framed the latest controversy as part of a broader national struggle over democratic norms. According to Pritzker, the Republican-led special session in Austin — originally called to discuss disaster relief following devastating floods in the Texas Hill Country — had been repurposed to serve partisan goals.

Texas Democrats, on their part, said they had no other choice.

“This wasn’t a decision we made lightly,” said Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus. “But it is one we make with absolute moral clarity.”

The Democrats’ move means the Texas House — which requires 100 of its 150 members to be present for quorum — will be unable to proceed with a vote on the redistricting plan, at least for now. With only 62 Democrats and 88 Republicans, the GOP was counting on Democratic attendance to push through the map.

But the walkout was not only symbolic; it was strategic.

“We are leaving our state to protect it,” Wu said. “To fight for our constituents, to fight for fair representation. What that looks like? We don’t know exactly. But we’re here. And we’re committed.”

Gov. Abbott was quick to respond. Dismissing the move as cowardly and unlawful, he vowed to act aggressively.

“Real Texans do not run from a fight,” Abbott said in a statement. “I will use every tool at my disposal to remove them from office and name their successors.”

He set a 3 p.m. Monday deadline for legislators to return and threatened to invoke a legal opinion that would allow him to declare the absentees’ seats vacant. The governor also warned that Democrats accepting out-of-state donations to cover fines might be vulnerable to felony bribery charges.

Attorney General Ken Paxton echoed the threats on social media.

“Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately,” he posted on X (formerly Twitter). “We should use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law.”

As history shows, this is not the first time Texas Democrats have left the state to stall legislative action. A similar move occurred in 2021, when Democratic lawmakers went to Washington, D.C. to protest new voting laws, resulting in a new Texas House rule that fines absent members $500 per day. The current standoff is already shaping up to be more costly — a report from the Texas Tribune estimates the cost of the Illinois stay could run up to $1 million per month. Party fundraisers are reportedly already seeking donations to cover expenses.

Governor Pritzker, who is a billionaire and a potential 2028 presidential contender, said he would not personally pay for the Texas Democrats’ stay but confirmed that his campaign staff had helped coordinate hotel options and logistics. According to sources close to the governor, the idea for the Democrats to take refuge in Illinois began taking shape in late June, during a dinner meeting with Kendall Scudder, head of the Texas Democratic Party. The conversation gained momentum in recent days after a follow-up meeting on Chicago’s South Side.

Meanwhile, the redistricting plan itself is drawing intense scrutiny. The Republican-sponsored map would reshape five congressional districts to favor GOP candidates, with opponents alleging it would dilute the voting power of Black and Latino communities through tactics like packing and splitting. Republican Rep. Todd Hunter, who authored the bill, was unapologetic.

“Different from everyone else, I’m telling you, I’m not beating around the bush,” Hunter said. “We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance.”

Critics, however, say that’s exactly the problem.

“They’re not trying to govern,” Rep. Wu said. “They’re trying to hijack the system. And Gov. Abbott is doing this in submission to Donald Trump so that Trump can steal our communities’ power and voice.”

Illinois Republicans, meanwhile, were quick to accuse Pritzker of hypocrisy. Senate GOP Leader John Curran pointed out that Illinois’ own congressional map — drawn by Democrats after the 2020 census — heavily favors their party.

“This is the height of hypocrisy,” Curran said. “Gov. Pritzker should be focused on strengthening democracy here in Illinois, not chasing headlines in Texas.”

Pritzker defended the Illinois map, arguing it was passed through normal legislative channels and complies with constitutional standards. He dismissed Republican criticism by saying that Illinois voters support Democratic policies because “we deliver.”

As the nation watches, the political standoff has added a fresh layer to the ongoing debate over gerrymandering, voting rights, and political power. What happens next will likely depend on the courts, the willpower of both parties — and the determination of lawmakers camped out far from home.

As the political showdown between Texas Democrats and their Republican counterparts escalates, the core issue of fair representation hangs in the balance. With Illinois becoming an unlikely haven and legal threats looming from Texas officials, the impasse reflects a larger national struggle over power, redistricting, and democratic norms. Whether this dramatic exodus will shift the political map or trigger deeper partisan divides remains uncertain—but one thing is clear: the battle lines over control of Congress in 2026 have already been boldly drawn.

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles.