Tag Archives: July jobs report

July jobs report

July Jobs Report Sends Shockwaves Through U.S. Labor Market

The July jobs report delivered a sobering view of the U.S. labor market, with only 73,000 jobs added—far below the 105,000 expected. Payroll gains for May and June were sharply revised downward by 258,000, leaving May at 19,000 and June at 14,000, marking the weakest performance since the nation began recovering from the COVID-19 recession in December 2020.

By late afternoon on August 1, President Donald Trump announced the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the U.S. commissioner of Labor Statistics, accusing her of manipulating employment figures for political purposes, though no evidence was provided.

In early afternoon trading, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped about 607 points, and the S&P 500 fell 1.5%. Over the past three months, the economy has averaged only 35,000 employment gains.

No Quick Recovery in Sight

Economists say the disappointing July jobs report is unlikely to be a temporary blip. Consumers have started limiting spending amid concerns that tariffs on imports are pushing up prices. Travel, dining, and recreational activities have slowed, and Pantheon Macroeconomics predicts employment growth will remain weak in sectors like manufacturing, retail, trucking, and warehousing.

“Sadly, employment appears set for a further summer slowdown as firms, facing renewed cost volatility from escalating trade tensions, remain focused on managing labor costs through reduced hiring, performance-based layoffs, restrained wage growth, and lower entry-level wages,” said Gregory Daco, chief economist of EY-Parthenon.

Trade Tensions Impacting Business Confidence

Executives’ confidence has weakened as tariffs squeeze profit margins. Pantheon Macroeconomics also predicts a sharper decline in business investment in the months ahead. On July 31, President Trump announced a new round of sweeping import tariffs, further straining corporate planning.

“Consumers are likely to restrain their spending further as import charges hit store shelves,” Pantheon said in a note.

Federal employment is another concern. The Labor Department has tracked 84,000 federal job losses this year, with the actual number of announced buyouts and cuts much higher. With the Supreme Court recently lifting a stay on mass federal layoffs, the decline in federal employment is expected to accelerate.

Recession Talks Return

Economists are increasingly cautious about a potential recession in 2025. Josh Bivens, chief economist at the Economic Policy Institute, said,

“To me, today’s jobs report is what entering a recession looks like. Could we pull up? Sure. But if we look back and end up dating an official recession that starts 3-6 months from now, this is what it would look like today – rapid softening in the labor market.”

Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, warned,

“A recession now appears very, very likely unless tariffs are lowered by Labor Day.”

He added that the combination of a weakening economy and a tumbling stock market might prompt the administration to reverse course on tariffs. However, if action is delayed, the ripple effects on retail prices and consumer sentiment may be irreversible.

Federal Reserve Watching Closely

Despite the tepid payroll growth, the unemployment rate edged only slightly higher to 4.2% in July, remaining historically low due in part to immigration constraints and deportations that shrank the labor force.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell noted after the July Federal Reserve meeting:

“We will focus primarily on the unemployment rate as we decide whether to lower rates in September.”

Morgan Stanley analysts suggest that weak job gains over the past three months increase the likelihood of a Fed rate cut in September. Futures markets now put the chances of a decrease at 85%, up from 45% after Powell’s July 30 remarks.

AI’s Early Impact on Job Gains

Artificial intelligence is starting to influence employment trends. Professional and business services lost 14,000 jobs in July, including roles in computer and technical fields. Staffing executives report that companies are replacing many entry-level IT workers with AI-driven solutions.

Jan Hatzius, chief economist at Goldman Sachs, said on CNBC:

“This is not the main thing driving the labor market, but we’re seeing early signs that AI is starting to affect entry-level IT hiring.”

The July jobs report signals a slowdown in the labor market that could weigh on economic growth and consumer confidence. Escalating tariffs, federal layoffs, and emerging AI adoption are combining to slow employment gains. Analysts warn that unless policy changes or stimulus measures are implemented, the U.S. could face a recession in 2025, with implications for markets, consumer spending, and business investment.

The July jobs report underscores a slowing U.S. labor market amid rising trade tensions, federal layoffs, and emerging AI disruptions. Weak payroll growth, coupled with cautious consumer spending and declining business confidence, has fueled concerns about a possible recession in 2025. Analysts warn that without timely policy adjustments or tariff relief, economic growth may remain constrained, leaving markets, workers, and businesses to navigate a period of heightened uncertainty.

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles.

Trump Fires Jobs Chief Over ‘Rigged’ Report Claims

In a move that has rattled Washington, former President Donald Trump announced the dismissal of U.S. Commissioner of Labor Statistics Erika McEntarfer, accusing her of manipulating national employment data for political motives — without offering evidence to support the claim.

Trump made the announcement on August 1 via his social media platform, Truth Social, where he criticized the July jobs report that showed only 73,000 jobs were added — significantly below the projected 105,000. He also pointed to downward revisions for May and June totaling 258,000 jobs, calling the entire reporting process “rigged.”

“We need accurate Jobs Numbers,” Trump wrote. “They can’t be manipulated for political purposes.”

A Sudden Shakeup at the Bureau of Labor Statistics

In a stunning and highly controversial move, former President Donald Trump has fired Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the U.S. Commissioner of Labor Statistics, accusing her of deliberately skewing employment data to serve political ends. The dismissal, announced on Trump’s Truth Social platform on August 1, has sent ripples through Washington, with economists, statisticians, and political analysts questioning both the timing and the rationale behind the decision.

The core of the issue stems from July’s jobs report, which revealed that the U.S. economy added only 73,000 jobs—far below economists’ forecast of 105,000. Additionally, job gains for May and June were revised downward by a combined 258,000, sparking concern over a possible economic slowdown. But Trump saw more than just economic warning signs—he saw what he called political tampering.

Trump’s Claims: A Battle Over Trust and Data

Without offering concrete evidence, Trump alleged that McEntarfer—who was appointed by President Joe Biden and confirmed by the Senate in early 2024—was involved in a scheme to “manipulate” jobs data to make the Republican-led economic performance appear weaker and to bolster Democratic nominee Kamala Harris during the 2024 election.

“We need accurate Jobs Numbers,” Trump declared. “Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate—they can’t be manipulated for political purposes.”

He went further, accusing McEntarfer of overseeing previous reports that were later revised downward, asserting that the agency had released overly optimistic data before the election, only to quietly correct them afterward.

However, official records tell a different story. The U.S. Department of Labor publicly disclosed in August 2024—well before the election—that job creation between April 2023 and March 2024 had been overestimated by 818,000. This type of benchmarking revision is common and part of the agency’s routine process of aligning survey data with tax records.

Who Is Erika McEntarfer?

Dr. McEntarfer is no political novice. A seasoned labor economist with more than two decades in federal service, she has held positions at both the U.S. Census Bureau and the Treasury Department. Her appointment to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) was met with bipartisan support at the time, largely due to her professional track record and nonpartisan background.

Yet, in Trump’s view, her leadership raised questions—not for her credentials, but for what he calls “untrustworthy numbers.” Speaking to reporters, he didn’t mince words:

“I fired her because I think her numbers were wrong.”

Pushback from the Statistical Community

The reaction from former Labor Department officials has been swift and unequivocal. A statement released by a coalition of former BLS commissioners and staff—signed by William Beach, who served as commissioner under Trump—called the accusation “baseless” and “damaging.”

“The Commissioner does not determine what the numbers are but simply reports on what the data show,” the statement clarified.

Experts emphasized that the methodology behind jobs data is purposefully decentralized. Hundreds of career civil servants contribute to the report each month, ensuring that no single individual can alter the outcome. The final report goes through multiple layers of verification before release.

Heidi Shierholz, former chief economist at the Labor Department, said it would be “literally impossible” for any one person—even the commissioner—to manipulate the figures without a massive number of people noticing.

“They’re not political,” she added. “There’s no way those numbers could be faked without widespread objection.”

The Complexity of the Jobs Report

Keith Hall, who led the BLS from 2008 to 2011 under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, explained that the final employment figure is built from inputs provided by hundreds of economists and survey specialists. According to Hall, even eight to ten staff members see the final number just before its release.

“It’s essentially impossible for the numbers to be fudged,” he said. “All the detail must add up, and many eyes are on it.”

Hall further criticized Trump’s remarks, noting that if there is a downturn in employment trends, such developments are typically reflected across multiple economic indicators—not just the monthly jobs report.

“If the president wants to know what made the numbers weak, he needs to look in the mirror, not at BLS,” he said.

Fallout and What Comes Next

Despite the backlash, Trump has not yet announced a replacement for McEntarfer, stating only that he plans to appoint “someone much more competent and qualified.” The sudden vacancy in one of the government’s most respected statistical agencies has left both markets and officials wondering how politicized the traditionally neutral BLS might become under future leadership.

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer initially did not challenge the July jobs report but later issued a statement expressing agreement with Trump’s emphasis on data integrity.

Meanwhile, many in the economic community have expressed concerns that this episode could undermine public trust in government-produced statistics at a time when the economy is facing new challenges.

The firing of Erika McEntarfer marks a rare and deeply controversial moment in the history of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics—an agency built on decades of nonpartisan credibility. While Donald Trump’s accusations have fueled political debate and drawn sharp responses from former officials and economists, the broader concern now lies in the precedent this sets. If statistical agencies become political battlegrounds, the reliability of critical economic data could be called into question by the very institutions meant to uphold it. As the dust settles, the country finds itself not only facing uncertainty in the job market but also confronting the fragility of trust in facts themselves.

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles.