Tag Archives: global security

Greece

Greece Sounds the Alarm at UN, Urges Calm Over Iran Conflict

In a world already reeling from conflict, the United Nations Security Council gathered once again—this time under the looming shadow of military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Greece’s Ambassador Evangelos Sekeris delivered a clear yet sobering call for restraint and diplomacy as fears of deeper instability gripped the global stage. With concerns rising over Iran’s nuclear intentions and fresh violence threatening to spiral, Sekeris reminded the Council—and the world—that reckless moves now could spark consequences far beyond borders. His words were calm, sharp, and undeniably urgent.

📌 STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • UN Security Council convenes emergency session as Iran crisis intensifies

  • Greece urges all sides to prioritize diplomacy and restraint

  • “This is the third time in 10 days,” says Ambassador Sekeris, citing urgency

  • Athens reiterates its firm stance that Iran must never obtain nuclear weapons

  • Military strikes on nuclear facilities spark international concern over escalation

  • Greece closely monitoring developments and calls for avoidance of further violence

The United Nations Security Council reconvened in an emergency session this week for the third time in just ten days, underlining the severity of the spiraling crisis in the Middle East following recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Among the voices urging calm and a return to diplomacy was Greece’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Evangelos Sekeris, who delivered a clear and measured address before the international body.

With the situation continuing to evolve rapidly, Ambassador Sekeris did not mince words in outlining the gravity of the developments. “This is the third time in 10 days that the Council has convened in emergency session, and rightly so,” he stated, drawing attention to the urgency and seriousness of the unfolding crisis.

According to Sekeris, the current scenario marks a dangerous turning point. “The situation is now more dangerous than ever since June 13,” he warned, referring to a significant escalation in regional instability. Without identifying specific actors behind the recent attacks, his comments reflected a broader concern shared by multiple delegations at the Council regarding the potential for wider conflict.

The Greek envoy reaffirmed his country’s consistent position on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. While diplomatic language dominated his address, his message remained firm and unequivocal. “It should never be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons,” he said, underscoring Greece’s alignment with longstanding international non-proliferation efforts.

In reference to the airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities—an act that has further intensified uncertainty across the region—Sekeris confirmed that Greece is following the developments closely.

Greece is following very closely and with concern the evolving situation,” he stated. “We reiterate our call for all parties to exercise restraint.”

As calls for de-escalation echoed throughout the Council chamber, Sekeris stressed the risks of letting emotions override diplomacy. “There is no need for further violence,” he cautioned, “especially given the potentially serious consequences.”

The ambassador’s appeal reflected a broader sentiment within the international community that any further aggression could destabilize an already fragile region. While avoiding partisan framing, Sekeris’s words reinforced the notion that restraint, rather than retaliation, must now take precedence.

In an atmosphere thick with concern but still holding space for diplomacy, Greece’s address served as a reminder that even amid crisis, channels for dialogue remain open—if global actors are willing to use them.

As tensions in the Middle East continue to escalate, Greece’s call at the UN Security Council serves as a timely reminder of the urgent need for diplomacy over destruction. In an atmosphere heavy with uncertainty, Ambassador Sekeris’s appeal for restraint and a peaceful resolution reflects growing global concerns over unchecked escalation. Whether the world heeds this call or drifts further into crisis remains to be seen—but the message from Greece is clear: now is the moment to choose dialogue, not devastation.

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles

US Hits Hard: Hegseth Hails ‘Incredible’ Blow to Iran’s Nuclear Program

In a high-stakes move that has jolted global attention, the United States launched “Operation Midnight Hammer”—a surprise military strike targeting Iran’s key nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The carefully guarded operation, personally ordered by President Donald Trump, was executed with stealth bombers and submarine-fired missiles. The Pentagon hailed it as a masterstroke of precision and secrecy, designed to cripple Iran’s nuclear capacity without touching civilians. As diplomacy fades and tensions rise, world leaders now stand at a turning point between conflict and compromise.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • U.S. launched airstrikes on Iran’s Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites.

  • Operation included submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles and B-2 stealth bombers.

  • Pentagon calls it the longest B-2 mission since 2001.

  • President Trump: Iran’s nuclear facilities are “completely obliterated.”

  • Israel preemptively attacked Iran days earlier; U.S. operation followed.

  • U.S. says Iranian people and military were not targeted.

  • Iran’s foreign ministry dismisses diplomacy post-strike; FM heading to Moscow.

  • Congressional response mixed over lack of prior consultation.

  • Hegseth: Peace is the long-term goal; Iran still has a diplomatic window.

In a dramatic shift in the Middle East’s power dynamic, the United States has confirmed carrying out a series of overnight precision strikes on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure in what officials have called one of the most complex joint-force operations in decades. In a press briefing held at the Pentagon early Sunday morning, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan “Razin” Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, offered the first detailed account of the covert military effort that has taken global defense and diplomatic circles by storm.

The targets—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—have long been known as the backbone of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity. The strikes, which took place under the operational codename “Midnight Hammer,” were directly ordered by President Donald Trump and executed with what the Pentagon described as “devastating precision.”

While the precision and scale of the strike have become the focal points of international media and political discourse, the way the mission unfolded reflected not just a show of military might but also a web of strategic deception and tightly-held secrecy. Pentagon officials confirmed that only a limited circle within Washington was aware of the timing or the nature of the mission in advance.

“Last night, on President Trump’s orders, U.S. Central Command conducted a precision strike in the middle of the night against three nuclear facilities in Iran—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—in order to destroy or severely degrade Iran’s nuclear program,”
Defense Secretary Hegseth stated at the Pentagon podium.

He emphasized that the operation also served a broader geopolitical message to the world.

“The mission demonstrated to the world the level of joint and allied integration that speaks to the strength of our alliance and our joint forces,”
he added.

From a tactical perspective, the operation was intricate. Gen. Caine offered insight into the military elements that were deployed, painting a picture of coordinated action across land, sea, and air. According to Caine, submarines stationed in the U.S. Central Command’s operational zone launched more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles just before the primary aerial strike began.

“At approximately 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time last night… a U.S. submarine… launched more than two dozen Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles against key surface infrastructure targets,”
Caine explained, adding that multiple deception tactics were used.

Caine also disclosed that the B-2 Spirit bombers involved in the operation executed what is believed to be the longest mission since 2001. Some of the aircraft were sent westward as decoys—toward the Pacific—misleading observers into thinking a strike was not imminent.

“It was an incredible and overwhelming success,”
Hegseth affirmed, noting that no Iranian troops or civilians were targeted in the mission.
“The order we received from our commander-in-chief was focused. It was powerful. And it was clear: we devastated the Iranian nuclear program.”

Hours later, President Trump addressed the nation in a televised speech from the White House, flanked by Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Hegseth himself. The president confirmed that the strikes had completely disabled Iran’s ability to enrich uranium at the three targeted facilities.

“Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,”
Trump declared.
“And Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier.”

The president emphasized that diplomacy was offered numerous times prior to the strike, but Iran failed to return to the negotiation table, pulling out of talks scheduled for June 15 in Oman. The decision to act militarily, he said, came after repeated provocations and Israel’s pre-emptive strikes earlier this month on June 12.

“A short time ago, the U.S. military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan,”
he said.
“Our objective was the destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity, and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world’s number one state sponsor of terror.”

President Trump also detailed the operation’s deceptive elements during a interview , revealing that six B-2 bombers seen flying toward Guam were intentionally used to mislead potential observers.

It was confirmed that the strategic use of misinformation.

“Those six B-2 bombers that were heading west toward Guam… would not have made it to Iran in time to take part in this strike,”
Griffin said, noting that this helped obscure the actual operation.

While many lawmakers applauded the bold move to counter Iran’s nuclear capabilities, others voiced criticism over the president’s unilateral decision-making and the absence of Congressional authorization. Concerns were also raised about potential regional escalation and long-term diplomatic fallout.

Iran has so far not issued an official statement through its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. However, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi expressed frustration over the collapse of diplomatic efforts.

“Last week, we were in negotiations with the U.S. when Israel decided to blow up that diplomacy. This week, the U.S. decided to blow up that diplomacy,”
Araghchi posted on X, formerly Twitter.
He also confirmed plans to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, reinforcing Iran’s “strategic partnership” with Russia.

Despite the escalation, Hegseth reiterated that the United States continues to pursue a peaceful resolution.

“As the president put out last night, he wants peace,”
he said.
“There needs to be a negotiated settlement here. We ultimately demonstrated that Iran cannot have a nuclear capability. That is a very clear mission set on this operation.”

Hegseth also confirmed that behind-the-scenes efforts to open diplomatic channels are ongoing.

“I can only confirm that there are both public and private messages being directly delivered to the Iranians in multiple channels,”
he noted.
“They understand precisely what the American position is… and we hope they do so.”

As the dust settles, the world watches closely. Whether the strikes become the catalyst for renewed peace talks—or ignite further conflict in an already volatile region—remains uncertain. But one thing is now undeniable: Iran’s nuclear program has been dealt a powerful and deliberate blow.

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles.