Tag Archives: gig economy

Uber and Lyft Drivers

California Breakthrough: Uber and Lyft Drivers Can Now Form Unions

In a move hailed as historic for ride-hailing workers, California Governor Gavin Newsom on Friday signed legislation that creates a pathway for Uber and Lyft drivers to organize industry-wide and negotiate for better pay and benefits. The agreement positions California as only the second U.S. state, after Massachusetts, to allow app-based drivers to unionize, offering them an unprecedented voice in shaping their work conditions.

Story Highlights:

  • California becomes the second U.S. state allowing Uber and Lyft drivers to unionize.

  • AB 1340 outlines pay and benefits bargaining rights for drivers.

  • SB 371 reduces insurance coverage requirements, lowering costs for drivers and riders.

  • Union recognition earliest by May 2026; requires 10% sign-up and 30% vote.

  • Proposition 22 limits bargaining power despite unionization efforts.

  • Insurance currently accounts for 32-45% of ride fares in California.

Unlike Massachusetts, where unionization was achieved through a costly ballot measure, California’s deal emerged from months of negotiations involving Sacramento Democrats, labor leaders from SEIU, and representatives from Uber and Lyft. This approach allowed lawmakers to avoid a high-stakes campaign while securing terms that could benefit drivers immediately.

At a press conference, Newsom emphasized the importance of the deal for drivers’ futures.

“This agreement offers Uber and Lyft drivers a voice, to give them choice, give them dignity, and a say about their future,” Newsom said.

He added,

“I say that because it needs to be said: I’m not naive about how people are feeling about their future.”

The legislation, AB 1340, authored by Assemblymembers Buffy Wicks and Marc Berman and sponsored by SEIU California, sets clear terms for bargaining. It allows Uber and Lyft drivers to seek increased pay, health insurance, and other employee benefits previously unavailable to app-based workers. Tia Orr, Executive Director of SEIU California, contrasted the California approach with federal actions under the Trump administration, which she said sought to undermine workers’ rights.

“Trump is gutting workers’ fundamental right to come together and demand fair pay and treatment,” Orr said.
“But here in California, we are sending a different message: when workers are empowered and valued, everyone wins. Shared prosperity starts with unions for all workers.”

Alongside AB 1340, Newsom signed SB 371, a bill authored by Senator Christopher Cabaldon, which lowers insurance coverage requirements for Uber and Lyft vehicles involved in accidents caused by underinsured drivers. Under the new law, coverage drops from $1 million to $300,000 per incident.

Uber estimates that insurance costs currently make up 32 percent of an average fare in California, rising to 45 percent in Los Angeles County. Uber’s California policy head, Ramona Prieto, described the legislation as a balance between drivers’ rights and the cost of services for passengers.

“AB 1340 and SB 371 together represent a compromise that lowers costs for riders while creating stronger voices for Uber and Lyft drivers,” Prieto said.

Despite the legislative breakthrough, unionization will not be immediate. Uber and Lyft drivers cannot apply for recognition until May 2026 at the earliest. Labor leaders must first gather signatures from at least 10 percent of California’s roughly 800,000 ride-hailing drivers. After that, 30 percent of drivers must vote in favor of forming a union before negotiations with the companies can begin.

Even if a union is established, Uber and Lyft drivers will face limitations under Proposition 22, a 2020 state ballot measure that prevents app-based workers from being classified as traditional employees. Uber and Lyft spent over $200 million to pass the measure, ensuring that drivers remain independent contractors.

The dual passage of AB 1340 and SB 371 marks a significant moment in the evolving gig economy. Advocates say it gives drivers more agency and protection while still allowing companies to manage operational costs. For Uber and Lyft drivers in California, the deal signals a potential shift in how app-based labor is valued and represented across the nation.

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles.

Pay Up: NYC Cracks Down on Uber and Lyft Driver Lockouts

In a decisive shift that rewrites the playbook for app-based driving in New York City, the Taxi & Limousine Commission (TLC) has approved a 5% increase in minimum pay for Uber and Lyft drivers, along with fresh curbs on sudden “lockouts” from platforms. These new rules—set to take effect August 1—aim to balance rising costs with fairer driver treatment, reshaping how companies manage access and pay. With pay per trip now set to reach $29.07, this measured yet bold move stirs the city’s ride-hail economy with quiet but firm authority.

🟩 STORY HIGHLIGHTS:

  • Minimum pay increased by 5%: New standard trip rate raised to $29.07.

  • App lockout restrictions introduced: 72-hour notice required; drivers allowed up to 16 hours of platform access per shift.

  • **NYTWA claims lockouts caused up to 25% income loss for drivers in 2024.

  • Economist recommended 6.1% pay raise, but TLC settled on 5%.

  • Future pay adjustments to follow rulemaking process instead of automatic annual hikes.

In a decision expected to reshape the working conditions of thousands of ride-hailing drivers in New York City, the Taxi & Limousine Commission (TLC) on Wednesday unanimously approved a series of rule changes aimed at improving earnings and protecting job access for drivers working under high-volume for-hire vehicle services such as Uber and Lyft. The revised policies include a 5% increase in the minimum driver pay standard and new restrictions on app-based “lockouts” that have long been criticized by driver advocacy groups.

Effective August 1, the updated pay formula will raise earnings for a typical 30-minute, 7.5-mile ride to $29.07. This marks a modest but symbolic improvement in driver compensation, reflecting a 5% increase from 2024 rates and a 26% rise since the city first implemented a structured pay system for app-based drivers in 2019.

The TLC’s move follows over a year of sustained organizing and policy engagement from the New York Taxi Workers Alliance (NYTWA), which accused ride-hailing platforms of using lockouts to suppress earnings by manipulating utilization rates — a core metric used by the city to determine per-trip driver pay. According to NYTWA, these lockouts often occurred mid-shift, leaving drivers unable to earn income and effectively stranded while logged out of the platforms they rely on for work.

While the dollar increase may appear incremental, advocates emphasized the deeper significance of the regulatory shift. Speaking after the vote, NYTWA Executive Director Bhairavi Desai said the new rules represent a crucial win in the broader fight for driver protections:

“The new Taxi & Limousine Commission rules are a victory for Uber and Lyft driver members of NYTWA to end lockouts and protect driver incomes,” she said.
“Lockouts are an attack on driver pay and driver dignity.”

NYTWA has long argued that app-based companies intentionally restricted driver access during off-peak hours or in lower-demand areas in order to maintain artificially high utilization rates. These inflated figures, in turn, enabled companies to minimize the wages they were required to pay under the city’s formula. The union claims that many drivers saw their earnings drop by as much as 25% in 2024 due to such tactics.

In response to these allegations, the TLC adopted a new set of regulations requiring companies to provide at least 72 hours’ notice before limiting a driver’s ability to log into the app. Additionally, once a driver begins a shift, the rules now require platforms to permit continuous access for up to 16 hours, with limited exceptions.

During the June 25 meeting, TLC Chair David Do described the changes as an important step toward ensuring that drivers have uninterrupted opportunities to work and earn.

“These proposed rules not only go a long way towards closing this loophole and providing further lockout protections for drivers,” he said,
“but they also provide a sensible pay increase based on inflation and increased expenses.”

Do further acknowledged the frustration many drivers faced under the previous system, where access to their livelihood could be revoked mid-shift without warning, disrupting their ability to earn.

The TLC had enlisted Dr. James Parrott, an economist at the Center for New York City Affairs, to assess the true costs faced by drivers and recommend adjustments. In a December 2024 report, Dr. Parrott proposed a 6.1% increase in per-mile rates, citing higher operating costs — particularly for electric vehicles and vehicle rentals. His research was based on survey responses from thousands of drivers and market data on vehicle expenses.

However, both Uber and Lyft pushed back during the public comment phase in February, raising questions about the reliability of survey data and assumptions around vehicle depreciation. Following the pushback, the TLC and Dr. Parrott conducted a supplemental review, incorporating trade-in values from Kelley Blue Book to adjust the cost model, which ultimately lowered the final raise to 5%.

In a statement to the press, Lyft expressed cautious relief that Parrott’s full recommendation was not adopted:

“While these changes are a step in the right direction,” a Lyft spokesperson said,
“we still have concerns that the underlying pay formula will still deprive drivers of earning opportunities, drive up prices for riders, and reduce ride availability, which isn’t good for anyone – especially the drivers who depend on steady demand to make a living.”

Uber, on the other hand, welcomed aspects of the rule changes, particularly the TLC’s decision to abandon automatic annual adjustments based on utilization rates. According to the company, this move represents the first official recognition that the existing system — which incentivized companies to restrict access in order to maintain utilization metrics — was inherently flawed.

“This shift marks the city’s first formal acknowledgment that time and distance-based utilization should be treated differently,” said Uber spokesperson Freddi Goldstein.

Uber has consistently criticized the current pay formula, arguing it forced platforms to make difficult decisions around driver access in order to remain compliant with utilization-driven wage standards. While the company did not directly comment on the new driver protections against lockouts, it emphasized that the revised model offers a more stable framework going forward.

Looking ahead, the TLC clarified that future pay increases will no longer follow an automatic schedule. Instead, rate changes will be considered through a formal rulemaking process, allowing the Commission to weigh additional factors such as changes in citywide travel trends, inflation, vehicle costs, and shifts in company practices — including the use of waitlists and access restrictions.

In its final statement, the Commission described the new approach as one that offers greater transparency and flexibility, better suited to the dynamic nature of the for-hire vehicle industry.

For the thousands of Uber and Lyft drivers navigating New York City streets each day, the new rules may offer a measure of predictability in an otherwise uncertain job environment — and, perhaps more importantly, a sense that their voices are beginning to shape the policies that govern their labor.

The New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission’s latest decision signals a pivotal moment in the evolving dynamics of app-based transportation. By introducing a structured pay increase and decisive action against exploitative lockout practices, the city has taken a firm step toward reinforcing fairness and stability in the gig economy. While platforms like Uber and Lyft remain cautious, the new rules highlight a growing insistence on accountability and transparency. For thousands of drivers navigating the city’s streets, these reforms offer not only improved earnings but also renewed recognition of their essential role in urban mobility.

Appreciating your time:

We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.

Post a Comment:

In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.

Stay Connected:

Don’t miss out on future updates and articles