In a lawsuit brimming with drama and international intrigue, French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron have filed a defamation case in Delaware against U.S. commentator Candace Owens. The suit accuses Owens of spinning wild and damaging tales — from gender identity claims to secret CIA plots — in what the Macrons describe as a reckless attempt to stir sensation, feed her audience, and profit from scandal. With global attention now fixed on the courtroom, this bold legal strike may decide the cost of false fame and viral slander.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
-
Filed in Delaware: The Macrons are suing Candace Owens and her business entities for defamation.
-
False Allegations: Claims include that Brigitte Macron is transgender, stole someone’s identity, and that she and President Macron are blood relatives.
-
Conspiracy Theories: Owens also allegedly linked President Macron to CIA mind-control programs like MKUltra.
-
Repeated Legal Notices: The Macrons sent three formal retraction demands before filing the suit.
-
Prepared to Testify: The Macrons are reportedly willing to appear in a Delaware courtroom.
-
Clare Locke Represents: The couple has enlisted the high-profile defamation law firm behind Dominion’s lawsuit against Fox News.
In a dramatic international legal development, French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron have initiated a defamation lawsuit against American conservative commentator Candace Owens. Filed in Delaware, the lawsuit accuses Owens of launching a sustained and calculated campaign of falsehoods, targeting the French first couple with inflammatory claims that the Macrons say have caused irreparable harm to their reputation and personal lives.
The legal action focuses on a series of statements and media productions made by Owens beginning in early 2024. The commentator, known for her provocative and often controversial takes, made headlines after declaring publicly that she would “stake [her] entire professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man.” According to the lawsuit, Owens did not stop at that statement but escalated her narrative through social media and a dedicated eight-part podcast series titled Becoming Brigitte.
Rather than issuing a retraction or clarifying her statements, Owens is alleged to have ridiculed the Macrons’ legal efforts and used them to further inflame her audience. The lawsuit accuses her of turning the couple’s identities into a “profit-driven spectacle,” amplifying bizarre theories and deeply personal falsehoods to attract followers and monetize outrage.
The suit specifically details a number of baseless and damaging claims: that Brigitte Macron was born a man and assumed someone else’s identity; that she and President Macron are related by blood and involved in an incestuous relationship; that Emmanuel Macron was selected to lead France through a covert CIA-run mind-control initiative like MKUltra; and that the couple has committed fraud and abuse of power to keep these so-called secrets buried.
The Macrons, in a rare joint statement released through their attorneys, said:
“Ms Owens’ campaign of defamation was plainly designed to harass and cause pain to us and our families and to garner attention and notoriety. We gave her every opportunity to back away from these claims, but she refused.”
They added:
“It is our earnest hope that this lawsuit will set the record straight and end this campaign of defamation once and for all.”
Beyond the reputational damage, the couple says they have endured significant emotional distress. According to the lawsuit, they now live under the constant weight of public mockery and invasive scrutiny. The lawsuit describes how the falsehoods have taken a real toll, noting that:
“Every time the Macrons leave their home, they do so knowing that countless people have heard, and many believe, these vile fabrications. It is invasive, dehumanizing, and deeply unjust.”
The Macrons allege that despite three formal requests for retraction—including supporting documentation meant to dispel Owens’ claims—Owens chose not only to ignore the demands but to double down. A press release from their law firm, Clare Locke LLP, states that Owens used the retraction requests themselves as “fodder” for more provocative content, mocking the couple and creating even more damaging narratives in their wake.
The Macrons are represented by Clare Locke, a firm known for handling major defamation cases in the U.S., including the high-profile Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit against Fox News. According to The Financial Times, the couple is willing to appear in court in Delaware, signaling how seriously they view the matter.
For now, Owens has not responded publicly to the lawsuit or media requests for comment.
With high-profile attorneys, international attention, and deep emotional stakes involved, this case could mark a significant turning point in the legal treatment of online defamation—especially when public figures are targeted across borders by conspiratorial narratives that blur the lines between commentary and fabrication.
Appreciating your time:
We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.
Post a Comment:
In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.
Stay Connected:
Don’t miss out on future updates and articles.