Staff Reporter
In a dramatic shift, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has rolled back key parts of a planned overhaul to disability benefits, aiming to avoid a major rebellion within his own Labour Party. The welfare reform, once expected to save £5 billion annually, will now affect only new applicants—leaving current claimants untouched. With mounting pressure from over 100 Labour lawmakers and sharp public scrutiny, Starmer’s retreat marks his third major U-turn in office, raising urgent questions over leadership strength, welfare priorities, and political stability in post-election Britain.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
-
Welfare reforms scaled back: New rules will apply only to future claimants
-
Labour dissent forces policy retreat: Over 100 MPs opposed the original measures
-
Revised savings estimate: Annual savings likely to fall by £3 billion
-
Third major U-turn: Follows previous reversals on pensions and public inquiries
-
Critics say harm still done: Disability groups reject “two-tier” support model
In a move that underscores the growing internal tensions within Britain’s ruling Labour Party, Prime Minister Keir Starmer sharply curtailed a controversial set of welfare reforms on Friday. The original proposals, designed to tighten access to sickness and disability benefits and reduce the country’s soaring welfare bill, will now only apply to new applicants — a major reversal following days of open rebellion from his own lawmakers.
The policy climbdown comes at a politically sensitive moment for Starmer, just one year into his tenure following a sweeping electoral victory that returned Labour to power. Despite his party’s commanding majority, Starmer faced the real threat of a parliamentary defeat next week, with over 100 Labour MPs signaling public opposition to the planned cuts. Their concern: that the proposed changes risked undermining the very welfare system the Labour Party helped build in the post-World War II era.
While Starmer stood firm on the need for reform, he acknowledged that compromise was essential.
“We’ve now arrived at a package that delivers on the principles, with some adjustments, and that’s the right reform,”
Starmer told reporters.
“Getting that package adjusted after listening to colleagues is the right thing to do. I’m really pleased now that we’re able to take this forward.”
The government had initially aimed to cut £5 billion ($7 billion) annually from the disability benefits budget. The proposed tightening of eligibility was intended to reduce the growing number of claimants, which ministers said reflected a system that discouraged work and became increasingly unsustainable.
“It doesn’t work and it traps people,”
Starmer said, defending the broader intent of the reform effort.
However, the pushback from within Labour ranks was swift and fierce. Many MPs saw the plan as politically toxic and ideologically inconsistent with the party’s roots. Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Minister, confirmed in a letter to lawmakers that only new benefit applicants would be affected by the revised rules — a shift that spares millions of existing claimants from losing support.
The climbdown was welcomed by several prominent Labour figures, including Meg Hillier, who chairs a key parliamentary committee and played a leading role in coordinating opposition to the original proposal.
“It’s a good and workable compromise,”
Hillier said, signaling a tentative truce within the party ranks.
Despite the relief within Labour, the financial trade-off was significant. Ruth Curtice, CEO of the Resolution Foundation think tank and a former senior Treasury official, said the retreat would reduce potential savings by around £3 billion annually — a steep drop from the £5 billion originally targeted.
Care Minister Stephen Kinnock said specifics of the budget impact would be revealed in the government’s autumn fiscal plan. Starmer’s spokesperson, when pressed, assured that the changes would be “fully funded” and would not involve any permanent increase in borrowing. However, no clarification was offered on whether new taxes would be introduced to cover the shortfall.
This marks the third major policy reversal for the Starmer government, signaling mounting difficulties in navigating both internal party dynamics and public opinion. Earlier this year, the government walked back on plans to scrap winter heating payments for pensioners and reversed its position on launching an inquiry into how authorities handled grooming gang cases — both U-turns made under pressure.
Opposition parties were quick to criticize the latest retreat. Helen Whately, the Conservative Party’s shadow work and pensions secretary, described it as a missed opportunity and a sign of weakness.
“This is a humiliating climbdown,”
Whately posted on X.
“It leaves taxpayers to pick up the bill and delays the tough but necessary decisions on welfare.”
From the other side of the debate, disability rights groups voiced strong dissatisfaction with the new version of the policy, calling it fundamentally unjust.
“It’s not a massive concession to have a benefit system where future generations of disabled people receive less support than disabled people today,”
said Mikey Erhardt, policy lead at Disability UK.
The group rejected what it termed a “two-tier system” that distinguishes between current and future claimants, arguing that the long-term implications for disabled individuals remain harmful and unfair.
Still, Starmer appears to have bought himself some time — and preserved party unity — by softening the blow of his reforms. The true political cost, however, may become clearer in the months ahead, especially as Britain’s welfare spending is projected to grow. According to official forecasts, incapacity and disability benefits are on track to exceed £100 billion ($137 billion) annually by 2030, already outpacing the nation’s defense budget.
As Starmer looks to maintain control of both his agenda and his party, Friday’s reversal serves as a reminder that majority rule does not always mean easy governance — especially when ideology, budgets, and human needs collide.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s decision to dilute the proposed welfare cuts highlights the fragile balance between fiscal reform and party unity. While the move may ease immediate tensions within Labour ranks, it also exposes the complexities of governing with bold promises in a post-austerity Britain. As disability advocates remain unconvinced and political opponents circle, the retreat signals not just a tactical pause, but a deeper test of Starmer’s resolve, leadership, and the path his government will chart amid rising costs and rising expectations. The welfare debate, it seems, is far from over.
Appreciating your time:
We appreciate you taking the time to read our most recent article! We appreciate your opinions and would be delighted to hear them. We value your opinions as we work hard to make improvements and deliver material that you find interesting.
Post a Comment:
In the space provided for comments below, please share your ideas, opinions, and suggestions. We can better understand your interests thanks to your input, which also guarantees that the material we offer will appeal to you. Get in Direct Contact with Us: Please use our “Contact Us” form if you would like to speak with us or if you have any special questions. We are open to questions, collaborations, and, of course, criticism. To fill out our contact form, click this link.
Stay Connected:
Don’t miss out on future updates and articles
